Daniel Penny Chokehold Trial: Lawyers Debate Legality In Subway Incident
Overview
The trial of Daniel Penny, the former New York City police officer charged with assault and strangulation in connection with the chokehold death of Eric Garner, has resumed on Wednesday, with lawyers debating the legality of the officer's actions.
Prosecution's Case
The prosecution contends that Penny used excessive force when he placed Garner in a chokehold during an arrest for allegedly selling untaxed cigarettes. They argue that the chokehold was illegal and that Penny knew or should have known that it posed a significant risk of death or serious physical injury.
Defense's Case
The defense maintains that Penny acted lawfully and reasonably under the circumstances. They argue that Garner resisted arrest and that Penny used the chokehold to subdue him without causing him serious injury. They also contend that the chokehold was not illegal and that Penny was not aware of any risk of death or serious physical injury.
Expert Testimony
Both sides have presented expert testimony to support their respective positions. The prosecution's expert, Dr. Michael Baden, testified that the chokehold caused Garner's death by depriving him of oxygen. The defense's expert, Dr. Bernard Weintraub, testified that the chokehold was not excessive force and that Garner's death was caused by his own underlying health conditions.
Jury Deliberations
The jury is expected to begin deliberating on the case later this week. They will be tasked with determining whether Penny is guilty of assault and strangulation. If convicted, Penny faces up to 10 years in prison.
Significance
The trial of Daniel Penny has drawn national attention and has sparked a debate about the use of chokeholds by police officers. The outcome of the trial could have significant implications for the way that police officers use force in the United States.