### Introduction
Kamala Harris, the former Attorney General of California and current Vice President of the United States, has faced criticism for her stance on Proposition 47, a measure passed in 2014 that reduced penalties for certain nonviolent crimes.
### Harris's Initial Support for Prop 47
Harris initially supported Prop 47, which reduced the number of people in California prisons and led to a reduction in recidivism rates. She argued that the measure would help break the cycle of crime and imprisonment, particularly for African Americans and Latinos.
### Opposition to Reversing Prop 47
In recent years, Harris has opposed efforts to reverse Prop 47, despite concerns that it may have led to an increase in retail theft. In 2020, she opposed Proposition 20, which would have reinstated tougher penalties for some crimes currently classified as misdemeanors.
### Reasons for Ambiguity
Harris's stance on Prop 47 has been ambiguous for several reasons:
### Impact of Stance on Legacy
Harris's stance on Prop 47 has both positive and negative implications for her legacy:
### Conclusion
Kamala Harris's stance on Proposition 47 has been ambiguous and has evolved over time. Her decision to oppose efforts to reverse the measure highlights the complexities of criminal justice reform and the challenges politicians face when navigating changing public opinion and their own beliefs.